Cases 1 - 10 of 226
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Randle v. Avina
as 24-10286
Plaintiff:
Brianna Randle and Sywayne Burgess
Defendant:
Cindy Avina, Individually and in her professional capacity
Benites Sosa v. Hill et al
as 1:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Wilber Jose Benites Sosa
Defendant:
Glendell Hill, Prince William-Manassas Regional Adult Detention Center, Pete Meletis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Moyle v. City of Princeton, Texas et al
as 4:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
Mark Moyle
Defendant:
City of Princeton, Texas, Derek Borg and Brianna Chacon
Intervenor:
Matthew Tanner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Smith v. Planet Fitness et al
as 1:2024cv00203
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Planet Fitness, Private Security Company, Brianna and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff:
Brianna Racquel Mitchell
Defendant:
Marc D. Smith, Illinois Department of Children and Family Services and Kimberly Bates
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MAYO v. BURGESS et al
as 1:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
BRIANNA MAYO
Defendant:
SHERIFF DUANE BURGESS, JOHNSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CHARLES J WARREN, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
