Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01526
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Thomas v. United States of America et al
as 8:2024cv01012
Plaintiff:
Michael Thomas
Defendant:
David Dixon, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and David Hall Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ef Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation (Excess Force)
Dixon v. Barr et al
as 1:2019cv01471
Defendant:
W Sandy McCain, Unknown Officers and Joseph Barr
Plaintiff:
David Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Dixon et al v. City of St. Louis et al
as 4:2019cv00112
Defendant:
City of St. Louis, Dale Glass, Rex Burlison and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Rozelle, David Dixon, Richard Robards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Perdue et al
as 2:2018cv00553
Plaintiff:
David Dixon
Defendant:
R. K. Perdue, II, S. K. Neal, C. A. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al
as 18-15268
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY S. TOFAUTE and DAVID DIXON
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF MADERA, MADERA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, DAVID A. LINN, District Attorney and others
Tofaute, et al v. County of Madera, et al
as 1:2016cv01627
Plaintiff:
Timothy S. Tofaute and David Dixon
Defendant:
County of Madera, Madera County District Attorney's Office, David Linn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03416
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
