Cases 1 - 10 of 18
LaFond v. Department of Justice et al
as 4:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
David LaFond
Defendant:
Department of Justice, FBI, FTC Fraud Dept and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hankerson v. 23 and me et al
as 1:2024cv01940
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hankerson
Defendant:
23 and me, Ancentry Genetic Date, B.G. Chinos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Strong v. FBI et al
as 1:2024cv10264
Plaintiff:
Gregory M Strong
Defendant:
FBI, FTC and FCC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Morris v. Trump
as 23-456
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Keith S. Morris
Defendant / Appellee:
President Donald Trump, Comm. Andrew M. Saul, of Social Security, Nancy A. Berryhill, Dep. Comm. of Social Security and others
Defendant:
A.L.J. Roxanne Fuller, A.G. William P. Barr, Department of Labor, Secretary of State (N.Y.) and others
Kirkendoll et al v. EEOC et al
as 2:2022cv01006
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kirkendoll, FTC and CDA
Defendant:
EEOC and Bureau of Labor Statistics
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Glenn v. Facebook et al
as 3:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Constance Glenn
Defendant:
Facebook, FCC, FTC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35080
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv01718
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
No v. USA LWS (NYC) et al
as 1:2019cv11674
Defendant:
USA LWS (NYC), FTC, WeWork and others
Plaintiff:
Jeong-Suk No
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Emrit v. Soros et al
as 1:2019cv00003
Defendant:
Federal Trade Commission (FTC), George Soros, Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Satish Emrit
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
