Cases 1 - 9 of 9
United States of America v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00887
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Americredit Financial Services, Inc. and Americredit Financial Services, Inc. doing business as GM Financial
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv03810
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
TRBR, Inc. d/b/a Superior Buick GMC et al v. Americredit Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a GM Financial et al
as 2:2020cv11269
Plaintiff:
TRBR II, INC. and TRBR, Inc. d/b/a Superior Buick GMC
Defendant:
General Motors Company, Americredit Financial Services, Inc. d/b/a GM Financial and General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eames v. Brown et al
as 2:2019cv06214
Defendant:
Dennis M. Brown, The Incorporated Village of Westhampton Beach, The County Of Suffolk and others
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Eames
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mills v. GM Financial Services Company, Inc.
as 8:2019cv00394
Plaintiff:
Jon A. Mills
Defendant:
GM Financial Services Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00411
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv12241
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Thurman v. Michael W. Boyd Law Firm et al
as 2:2012cv02709
Plaintiff:
Derrick Thurman
Defendant:
Michael W. Boyd Law Firm, Locke D. Barkley and GM Financial
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
