Cases 1 - 10 of 430
PEELE v. JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA et al
as 4:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
JARVIS PEELE
Defendant:
JEFFERSONVILLE, INDIANA, JEFFERSONVILLE CITY COUNCIL, KENNY KAVANAUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nord Hodges et al v. Passidomo et al
as 8:2024cv00879
Plaintiff:
Keto Nord Hodges, Meiko Seymour, Jarvis K. El-Amin and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Passidomo and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv08111
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626 Job Discrimination (Age)
Barajas v. Saline County, Arkansas et al
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Barajas
Defendant:
Saline County, Arkansas, Hunter Thompson, Sullivan Sulzberger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Hertrich et al
as 1:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
Pastor Jarvis Robinson
Defendant:
Fred Hertrich, II, Fred Hertrich, IV, Al Guckes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00654
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mathis v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv04278
Plaintiff:
Jarvis Mathis
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, R. Collins, M. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jarvis v. Monte
as 4:2024cv00072
Plaintiff:
Karen Jarvis
Defendant:
Tom D. Monte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Weems (PS) v. Cementary Staff Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv01243
Plaintiff:
Tyra Weems
Defendant:
Cementary Staff Georgia, Clifford Harriss, Jarvis Weems Knot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
