Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Fanty v. Greater Dayton Premier Management
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas Fanty
Defendant:
Greater Dayton Premier Management
Hall Gibbs v. Black Man Cashier at Front Counter et al
as 6:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Doris B. Hall Gibbs
Defendant:
Black Man Cashier at Front Counter, White Woman Store Manager, Walgreens Store Claxton GA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00724
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Taylor v. The City of Dallas et al
as 3:2015cv03321
Plaintiff:
Sherrard Dewayne Taylor
Defendant:
The City of Dallas , Jesse Robert Aquino, Ricardo Salas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delare v. Hutchinson, City of et al
as 0:2015cv03031
Defendant:
Hutchinson, City of and Eric Steven Killian
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas Delare
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv06139
Defendant:
Sergeant Viet Cao, City of New York and Police Officer John Doe
NYPD:
New York City Police Department
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. City of New York et al
as 1:2013cv01945
Defendant:
City of New York, NYPD Officials John Doe 1 and John Doe 2 and NYPD Detective Christopher Ward
Plaintiff:
Justin Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
LUCAS v. THOMAS et al
as 1:2011cv00119
Defendant:
CITY OF GREENFIELD and JUSTIN THOMAS
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM M. LUCAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
