Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01773
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Wengeler v. King et al
as 2:2022cv01457
Plaintiff:
Carl Wengeler
Defendant:
Lauren J King, David G Estudillo, Richard Creatura and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khalil v. Wilson et al
as 2:2021cv12577
Plaintiff:
Edward Khalil
Defendant:
Ernest Wilson, Karen Miller and Derryck Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Miller
as 9:2020cv81422
Plaintiff:
Lanesha Sims
Defendant:
Karen Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. Miller et al
as 3:2020cv00040
Defendant:
Bryan Miller and Karen Miller
Plaintiff:
Ray Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compere v. Elliot et al
as 9:2020cv80018
Defendant:
Palm Beach Clerk of Court, Steven Cripps, Brian Elliot and others
Plaintiff:
Noorly Compere
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United African Asian Abilities Club et al v. Karen Miller
as 2:2019cv05392
Defendant:
KAREN MILLER, As Trustee Of The LOUIS MILLER REVOCABLE TRUST, Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Karen Miller
Plaintiff:
United African-Asian Abilities Club, On Behalf Of Itself And Its Members, Jessie James Davis IV and United African Asian Abilities Club
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Shelia Y. Cruthirds v. Karen Miller
as 15-1165
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHELIA Y. CRUTHIRDS
Defendant - Appellee:
KAREN MILLER, Division Chief Child Youth School Age Services/Directorate Family, Morale, Welfare and Recreation (CYSS/DFMWR) and JOHN M. MCHUGH, Secretary, Department of the Army
Cruthirds v. Miller et al
as 5:2013cv00849
Plaintiff:
Shelia Y. Cruthirds
Defendant:
Karen Miller and John M. McHugh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
