Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Lusk v. CITY OF MEMPHIS et al
as 2:2023cv02148
Plaintiff:
Bobby Lusk
Defendant:
CITY OF MEMPHIS, Shelby County, Chris Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawn Lusk v. Bradley Norton
as 23-6059
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAWN LUSK
Defendant / Appellee:
BRADLEY A. NORTON, in their individual capacities, CHRIS MERCHANT, in their individual capacities, THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Jeffrey Lusk v. Alsata Lamin, et al
as 22-3360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY WILLS LUSK, Individually and as Executor of the Estate of Dorothy Jean Ross Lusk, Deceased
Defendant / Appellee:
ALSATA SALIMATU LAMIN, R.N., CHRISTA J. KING, N.H.A., SHCP FRANKLIN, INC., dba Crowne Pointe Care Center and others
Bressler et al v. Lusk et al
as 2:2022cv00035
Executor:
Heather Bressler
Defendant:
Zachary Lusk and Douglas Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lusk v. Peppers et al
as 8:2021cv01976
Defendant:
Chris Merchant, United States Postal Service, April Peppers and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Lusk
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gibson v. Goldston et al
as 5:2021cv00181
Plaintiff:
Matthew Gibson
Defendant:
Louise E. Goldston, County Commission of Raleigh County, Kyle Lusk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph v. Isbell et al
as 4:2021cv00208
Defendant:
Edward Reed, Annissa Renee Isbell and Carl Lusk
Plaintiff:
Stanley Joseph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lusk v. Lamin et al
as 2:2020cv06064
Defendant:
Alsata Salimatu Lamin, Brian Kenneth Pulliam, Lynn Marie Gutridge and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Wills Lusk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Myers v. St. George Police Department et al
as 4:2020cv00113
Defendant:
Kyle Whitehead, Dannielle Larkin, St. George, City of and others
Plaintiff:
Nathan Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv03112
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
