Cases 1 - 10 of 322
TX Entertainment Assoc v. Paxton
as 24-50434
Plaintiff:
Texas Entertainment Association, Incorporated, Lone Starr Multi-Theaters, Limited, doing business as New Fine Arts West, XTC Cabaret, Incorporated, doing business as XTC Cabaret Austin and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Attorney General, State of Texas and Ed Serna, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Texas Workforce Commission
Sims v. Starr et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Allan D. Sims, Jr.
Defendant:
Laura Starr, Deputy McCoulough, Judge Stevens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HAIRSTON v. STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS. et al
as 1:2024cv00753
Plaintiff:
STARR HAIRSTON
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA/INDPLS., FISHERS COMMUNITY NORTH HOSPITAL, IPD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Starr v. Hall
as 8:2024cv00152
Plaintiff:
Eddie Starr
Defendant:
Geoffrey C. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garcia et al v. STARR COUNTY TEXAS et al
as 7:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Maria N Garcia, Jose Bazan and Jose Bazan Jr
Defendant:
Starr County Texas, Gocha A Ramirez and Gerardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VERGARA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv05555
Defendant:
REGINA INEZ PEOPLES, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Plaintiff:
LUIS EDUARDO VERGARA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Starr v. Hicks
as 3:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Carl Starr
Defendant:
Bill Hicks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gonzalez v. Ramirez et al
as 7:2024cv00132
Plaintiff:
Lizelle Gonzalez
Defendant:
Gocha Allen Ramirez, Alexandria Lynn Barrera, STARR COUNTY TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
