Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Harold Ross, Sr. v. Essex County Superior Court, et al
as 24-2315
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C., HONORABLE ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, J.S.C., HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv05966
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
SCHEMELIA v. LOWER ALLOWAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP et al
as 1:2024cv06485
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SCHEMELIA
Defendant:
RICHARD VENABLE and LOWER ALLOWAYS CREEK TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791 Job Discrimination (Rehabilitation Act)
Venable v. Venable
as 4:2023cv01245
Plaintiff:
Tearsha Venable doing business as Hottwhips, LLC
Defendant:
Robert L. Venable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROSS, SR. v. ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 2:2023cv03122
Plaintiff:
HAROLD ANTHONY ROSS, SR.
Defendant:
ESSEX COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, HONORABLE DAVID KATZ, J.S.C, HONORABLE ARTHUR BATISTA, J.S.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-35508
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Fritz v. Sullivan County, Tennessee et al
as 2:2022cv00054
Plaintiff:
Robin Fritz
Defendant:
Sullivan County, Tennessee, Rodger Jones, Brandon Harer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SILVA v. SCHAUDIES et al
as 1:2021cv00870
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
JESSE SCHAUDIES, VENABLE LLP, 13 MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SILVA v. VENABLE LLP
as 1:2021cv00868
Plaintiff:
DANIEL JAMES SILVA
Defendant:
VENABLE LLP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
