Cases 1 - 10 of 319
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Hollywood Sikh Temple et al
as 2:2024cv05155
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Hollywood Sikh Temple, Nishapur, Iran, Archbishopric of Reims and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawrence Wilder, Sr. v. Attorney General
as 24-1514
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Gray v. City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi et al
as 1:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gray
Defendant:
City of Ocean Springs, Mississippi, David Wilder and Cody Gill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-7073
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00305
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WILDER v. THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2024cv00557
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WILDER
Defendant:
THE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY doing business as RIVERWALK VILLAGE and AMERICAN SENIOR COMMUNITIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wilkerson v. Phelps-Powers et al
as 3:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Patrick Wilkerson, Sr
Defendant:
Melanie Phelps-Powers, Lisa Bruder, Lucas Wilder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Wilder v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv05036
Plaintiff:
Jack Ryan Wilder
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00844
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
