Cases 91 - 100 of 2,738
Curry v. Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
as 5:2023cv00583
Petitioner:
Jeriton Lavar Curry
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - USP II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chavez v. Curry County Detention Center
as 2:2023cv00866
Plaintiff:
John Michael Chavez
Defendant:
Curry County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Easom v. Lance et al
as 6:2023cv01409
Plaintiff:
Warren Edwin Easom
Defendant:
Clayton J. Lance, Maia Mello, Curry County, OR, Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry v. Devos et al
as 3:2023cv05865
Petitioner:
William Curry, Jr
Respondent:
Keith Devos, Brian Judd, Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Williams v. Gerhardt et al
as 2:2023cv01238
Plaintiff:
Anthony Williams
Defendant:
M. Wayne Gerhardt, Jude Washington, Michael T. Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Curry, Jr. v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2023cv03144
Petitioner:
George Thomas Curry, Jr.
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus(Death Penalty)
Currie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01865
Petitioner:
Marshall James Currie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Curry v. Cutt et al
as 2:2023cv00048
Plaintiff:
Brittany Samantha Curry
Defendant:
David Cutt, Joey Runyon, Angela Mesmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CURRIE v. USA
as 1:2023cv00660
Petitioner:
EMANUEL CURRIE
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ridgley v. Currie
as 4:2023cv02770
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Ridgley
Defendant:
Tammy Currie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
