Cases 91 - 100 of 653
Paul Gwaz v. C. Roberson
as 22-7454
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL RONOLD GWAZ
Defendant / Appellee:
DEPUTY C. ROBERSON, KLINK, Prosecutor, RANA NAVARRETE, Magistrate of Charles City and others
WILLIAMS v. POBORSKY
as 3:2022cv00242
Plaintiff:
SHAWN L. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
COII STEPHEN POBORSKY, CO1 BRADLEY MORGAN, JR., CO11 C.A. NEYMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00701
Plaintiff:
Brandon Elliot Carter
Defendant:
Rolanda Calloway and Steven T. Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv02908
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lt Livingston, C/O Gipson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vincent Wilson v. William Newman
as 22-7398
Plaintiff / Appellant:
VINCENT ELLIOT WILSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM NEWMAN, Judge
Wilson v. Greenbelt Maryland
as 1:2022cv03075
Plaintiff:
Vincent Elliot Wilson
Defendant:
Greenbelt Maryland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Page v. Roane
as 5:2022cv00285
Petitioner:
Elliot Page
Respondent:
Warden Roane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gallup v. Vitale et al
as 1:2022cv01076
Plaintiff:
Robert Murray Gallup, III
Defendant:
Unknown Vitale, Bertrand Clarence Elliot, Kent County Sheriff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elliott v. Brandt et al
as 3:2022cv02668
Plaintiff:
Lason Elliot and Lason Elliott
Defendant:
Derek Brandt and Anthony D. Wills
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lurry v. Shelby County Justice Center et al
as 2:2022cv02795
Plaintiff:
Corey Deshun Lurry
Defendant:
Shelby County Justice Center, A. Moore, B. Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
