Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 131 - 140 of 10,025
Radford v. Taylor et al
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff: Tommy Radford
Defendant: Scott Taylor, M Kelly, B Edmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warfield v. South Dakota Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv04049
Plaintiff: Kelly Warfield
Defendant: South Dakota Department of Corrections and State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Kelly Harper v. USA
as 24-1384
Petitioner: KELLY HARPER
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
McElrath v. Kincaid
as 2:2024cv00312
Plaintiff: Donald Lee McElrath
Defendant: Kelly Kincaid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KELLY v. SIMMONS et al
as 3:2024cv00102
Plaintiff: TERRENCE KELLY
Defendant: CHIP W SIMMONS, M HOUSAM and RAY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly Clark v. Chadwick Dotson
as 24-6211
Petitioner: KELLY JAMES CLARK, JR.
Respondent: CHADWICK DOTSON
Quist v. Wasko et al
as 1:2024cv01004
Petitioner: Bradley D. Quist
Respondent: Kelly Wasko and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brentrez McPherson v. Georgia Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-10687
Plaintiff: BRENTREZ MCPHERSON
Defendant: GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, TYRONE OLIVER, JACOB BEASLEY and others
Mosley v. Kelly et al
as 1:2024cv01846
Plaintiff: Johnathan N Mosley
Defendant: Mike Kelly, Well Path, S Hunckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Department of Health
as 3:2024cv00178
Plaintiff: Paul C. Jones
Defendant: Department of Health, Eastern Louisiana Mental Health Systems, Turn Key Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?