Cases 131 - 140 of 879
Miller II v. Ogle County Sheriff Department et al
as 3:2019cv50032
Defendant:
Ogle County States Attorney Office, Judge Roe and Ogle County Sheriff Department
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A. Miller II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROE v. SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2019cv00056
Petitioner:
LANA KAY ROE
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT OF STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, MUNCY, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 0:2019cv00059
Plaintiff:
Antonyo A. Martin, Sr.
Defendant:
Inmate John Doe, Correctional Officer John Doe, South Carolina Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. USA
as 3:2019cv00029
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Stephen Leslie Roe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gregory v. Hurwitz et al
as 1:2018cv03605
Defendant:
Dr. I. Negron, Hugh Hurwitz, Dr. R. Lepiane and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Lee Gregory
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MUHAMMAD v. SAMUAH et al
as 3:2018cv16284
Defendant:
OLIVIA SAMUAH, DOCTOR JOHN MOE TWO, RAMIREZ and others
Plaintiff:
YUSUF ABDULLAH MUHAMMAD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Olsson v. Jung-Oliver et al
as 1:2018cv07084
Defendant:
James Corcaran, Maureen Jung-Oliver, Illinois Inspector General and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Olsson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller II v. Loves Park Police Dept. et al
as 3:2018cv50334
Defendant:
Judge Roe, Winnebago County Circuit Court, Winnebago County Circuit Clerk and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin A. Miller II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Staake v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv03254
Defendant:
Peter/Pricilla Poe 1-2, Illinois Department of Corrections, Richard Roe 1-2 and others
Plaintiff:
Jared M Staake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Johnson County et al
as 3:2018cv02497
Defendant:
Richard Alford, Philip Roden, Robert Matson and others
Plaintiff:
John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
