Cases 11 - 20 of 1,319
Benally v. Coconino, County of et al
as 3:2024cv08049
Plaintiff:
Renalda Benally
Defendant:
Coconino, County of, Coconino County Jail District, James Driscoll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HEATH v. PDP COMMISSIONER et al
as 2:2024cv01090
Plaintiff:
DARRELL M. HEATH
Defendant:
PDP COMMISSIONER, MEDICAL DIRECTOR and PAROLE CHAIRMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Parte et al
as 2:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Kay Parte, DeAnn Parte, Stacy Davenport and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Heath v. Carillio
as 2:2024cv00155
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Keyon Carillio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Slater et al v. Buckner et al
as 6:2024cv03064
Plaintiff:
Joshua R Slater and Jermaine McDaniels
Defendant:
Michele Buckner, Heath Cantrell, Smith Billy William and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Phelps et al
as 3:2024cv00303
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Madison Correctional Security Management, Tangipahoa Parish Jail, Leslie Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Martinez v. Heath et al
as 2:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
Fred Feleki Martinez
Defendant:
Heath and D. Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cowgill v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Jeffery S Cowgill
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Rowe
as 2:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Larry Rowe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
