Cases 11 - 20 of 697
Ash v. Phillips et al
as 2:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Ryan Ash
Defendant:
Robert Phillips, III, Dustin Hardway, Kevin Fairfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. OLIVER et al
as 5:2024cv00021
Plaintiff:
JABBARI KEYON ASH, SR
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TYRONE OLIVER and WARDEN SCOTT WILKES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ASH v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ASH
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Randle v. Contra Costa County Conflicts Panel et al
as 3:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Ramello D. Randle
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Conflicts Panel, Anthony Guy Ashe, Lawrence Steven Strauss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARTLOW v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02207
Plaintiff:
EDWARD M. PARTLOW
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLENE BURKETT, A. BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ash v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2023cv02473
Plaintiff:
Arthur Ash
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of and Seth Walters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOORE v. ASH
as 1:2023cv02019
Plaintiff:
REONTE MOORE
Defendant:
K. ASH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Rozas et al
as 8:2023cv02365
Plaintiff:
Rickey Lamar Evans, Jr.
Defendant:
Marrissa K. Rozas, Ashely G Allen, Jeffrey V. Catlin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALKER v. DISMAS CHARITIES INC
as 5:2023cv00399
Plaintiff:
ELBERT WALKER, JR
Defendant:
DISMAS CHARITIES INC and ASHELY THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
CARTER-RADER v. CENTURION et al
as 2:2023cv00462
Plaintiff:
BOBBIE JO CARTER-RADER
Defendant:
CENTURION, T. HOLLER, BETH MOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
