Cases 11 - 20 of 313
Brown v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv02902
Petitioner:
C L Brown
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Russell v. Minor et al
as 4:2020cv01238
Defendant:
McCloud and C. L. Minor
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayde Russell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Person v. Davis et al
as 7:2020cv00146
Defendant:
J. S. Harrison, C. L. Parr, C. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Person
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. O.C.C.C. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00080
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Defendant:
O.C.C.C. Warden and D.P.S. Director
Interested Party:
Shelley Harrington and Laurie Nadamoto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
C. L. v. Wilson et al
as 1:2019cv00792
Defendant:
Lieutenant Scott Hall, David R. Wilson, Correctional Officer Chelsea Ryder and others
Plaintiff:
C. L.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walker v. Johnson et al
as 3:2019cv00673
Defendant:
Deputy Smith, T Breaux, C L Fondren and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Lavelle Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowan v. State of Hawaii et al
as 1:2019cv00254
Plaintiff:
George C. L. Rowan
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Defendant:
Public Safety Department and State of Hawaii
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Lott et al
as 3:2018cv03362
Defendant:
Lawrence G Wedekind, Alexander S Macaulay, Jill C Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Isaac Goodman, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kevin Deon Brazier v. California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2018cv02348
Defendant:
T. Lee, California Department of Correction and Rehabilitation, M. Voong and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Deon Brazier
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Steven Wayne Bonilla v. Nancy Alvarez et al
as 2:2018cv06574
Defendant:
Sherri R. Carter, John Doe, William C. Ryan and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
