Cases 11 - 20 of 106
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv01482
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. Alcoza et al
as 6:2023cv00607
Plaintiff:
Larry Dewayne Garrett
Defendant:
FNU Alcoza, Turn Key Nurses, Sheriff FNU Lang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MOTA v. LOVERIDGE et al
as 2:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
SANTOS CASTRO MOTA
Defendant:
LESLIE LOVERIDGE, ELAL CARDE, CAPT. MILLARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. HSU Manager Archer et al
as 1:2023cv00646
Plaintiff:
Douglas Mack Carroll
Defendant:
HSU Manager Archer, Lt Maucaully, Lt Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Card
as 23-4061
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
DANIEL L. CARD
Smith v. C.O. D.J et al
as 1:2023cv10518
Plaintiff:
Steven L Smith
Defendant:
C.O. D.J, Lt Langston, Lieutenant Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Graham v. Chisholm et al
as 3:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Graham
Defendant:
Melinda Chisholm, Ms. Card, Polk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alton Brown v. Tom Wolf, et al
as 22-2751
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALTON D. BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM WOLF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, DR. A. SANTOS and others
Debtor / Appellee:
MINDY ANDRETTI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05000
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lightfeather v. Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card et al
as 8:2022cv00236
Plaintiff:
Austin Edward Lightfeather
Defendant:
Credit Buarul Capitol One Credit Card, Vista Print Credit Pay Pal, Amazon Credit Card and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
