Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Daniels v. Correction Officer #1 John Doe et al
as 9:2020cv00888
Defendant:
Correction Officer #1 John Doe, Great Meadow Staff Nurse: Jane Doe, Correction Officer #2 John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kent D. Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trent v. Daniels et al
as 5:2019ct03184
Defendant:
Lt. Connor, Officer Wadford, Superintendent Watson and others
Plaintiff:
Terrance Jerome Trent
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Swajanen et al
as 2:2019cv00117
Defendant:
Unknown Eiseman, Unknown Ogel, Unknown Harris and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel #537193 v. Hoffman-Prusi et al
as 2:2019cv00101
Defendant:
James Alexander, Unknown Durant, R. Horack and others
Plaintiff:
Allen D. Daniel #537193
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel v. Keyes et al
as 5:2019cv00170
Respondent:
Judge Harry S. Mattice, R. Keyes and The United States Marshal
Petitioner:
Thaddeus D. Daniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Daniels v. Groover
as 3:2019cv00020
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Daniels
Defendant:
Katherine E. Groover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniels v. USA
as 5:2018cv01607
Petitioner:
Steven D. Daniels
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodriguez v. Graham et al
as 6:2018cv06361
Plaintiff:
Nelson Rodriguez
Defendant:
Harold D Graham, Eric T. Schniederman, Ray A. Kyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. United States Marshal
as 1:2018cv00097
Plaintiff:
Thaddeus D Daniel
Defendant:
United States Marshal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jackson v. Daniels et al
as 5:2017ct03222
Plaintiff:
Quincy Jackson
Defendant:
D. Daniels, S. Fonville, Mr. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
