Cases 11 - 20 of 133
Hernandez-Lizarraga v. Napier et al
as 2:2023cv02062
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Hernandez-Lizarraga
Defendant:
Gregory Napier, Detective Mcleod, Deputy Prosecutor Robert McClure and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Mann v. Doug Clark, Warden, et al
as 22-2750
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent / Appellee:
Doug Clark, Warden, SDSP and Attorney General of South Dakota
Garcia v. Watson
as 22-10863
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant / Appellee:
Michael Q. Watson, Off-site Contracted Professional
Conley v. Dr. Bhat et al
as 3:2022cv00371
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Conley
Defendant:
Dr. Bhat, Brandy Moon and PA Clemens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00088
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Gallow
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Conley v. Culpeper Sheriffs Office
as 7:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Conley
Defendant:
Culpeper Sheriffs Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gallow v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2022cv00082
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Gallow
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Daniel Ray Loyd et al v. Kathleen Allison et al
as 5:2021cv01817
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Loyd, Anthony M. Rivera, Nicholas Brimage and others
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Niel McDowell, V. Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Clark et al
as 4:2021cv04158
Petitioner:
Daniel Ray Mann
Respondent:
Doug Clark and Attorney General of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv00193
Plaintiff:
Daniel Roy Garcia and Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
B Thompson, J Johes and E Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
