Cases 11 - 20 of 29
John Neuendorf, II v. St. Joseph's Hospital, et al
as 13-16030
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN NEUENDORF, II
Defendant - Appellee:
ST. JOSEPH'S HOSPITAL, WILLIAM C. SCIBETTA, Anesthesiologist Medical Doctor at St. Joseph's Hospital, JAMES A. MANKIN, Assistant Medical Doctor at St. Joseph's Hospital and others
Mann v. Lynn et al
as 1:2013cv00052
Plaintiff:
Jessie Brian Mann
Defendant:
Lesley Lynn, Russell David Oliver and Unknown Spielman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neuendorf #147980 v. St. Joseph's Hospital et al
as 2:2012cv02724
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Defendant:
St. Joseph's Hospital, William C Scibetta, James A Mankin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Montgomery County Jail et al
as 2:2012cv04060
Plaintiff:
David Oliver
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail, D T Marshall and Wanda Robinson
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oliver v. Jones et al
as 4:2012cv00442
Petitioner:
Carlos David Oliver, Jr
Respondent:
Justin Jones and Tim Wilkinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Clements v. Brimfield Township et al
as 1:2012cv01180
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jason Clements
Defendant:
Brimfield Township, Brimfield Township Police Department, David Oliver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OLIVER v. BUTTS
as 1:2011cv00988
Respondent:
KEITH BUTTS
Petitioner:
DAVID OLIVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Finster et al
as 4:2011cv00037
Plaintiff:
Scotty Brown
Defendant:
Mark Finster and David Oliver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Allen v. Pam Ahlin
as 10-17930
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID OLIVER ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
PAM AHLIN
David Allen v. Pam Ahlin
as 10-16053
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID OLIVER ALLEN
Respondent - Appellee:
PAM AHLIN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
