Cases 11 - 20 of 212
Jacobs v. Gant et al
as 5:2023cv00208
Plaintiff:
Stephan Jacobs
Defendant:
Shelia Gant and Amiee Kearns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Gant v. Vega et al
as 8:2023cv01525
Plaintiff:
Andre Patrick Gant
Defendant:
Deputy Jonathan Vega, Sargeant Farrier, Deputy Mir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. King
as 0:2023cv01766
Petitioner:
Joseph Gant
Respondent:
M. King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(PC) King v. Gant et al
as 1:2023cv00640
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lee King
Defendant:
Gant and Vitto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon v. Bourbon County et al
as 5:2023cv00107
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon
Defendant:
Bourbon County, Sheriff Tony Asbury, Jailer West Burberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GANT v. VANIHEL et al
as 2:2022cv00208
Plaintiff:
ANTOINE GANT
Defendant:
FRANK VANIHEL, JERRY SNYDER and HOLCOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Gant v. Sean Marler, et al
as 22-1396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH GANT
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MARLER, Warden, MRS. KNOX, A.W., MARISSA NASH and others
Sanders #305405 et al v. Macauley et al
as 1:2022cv00018
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Sanders #305405, Anthony Murphy #769317, Maurice H. Fielding #666102 and others
Defendant:
Matt Macauley, Unknown Walzach, Brian Hadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gant v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2021cv02985
Petitioner:
Curtis Gant
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gant v. Bureau of Prisons
as 1:2021cv00157
Plaintiff:
Montecarlos Marteze Gant
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
