Cases 11 - 20 of 1,919
Hodges v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ruth Hodges
Defendant:
Mesa, City of, K Newby, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Bell v. Clay et al
as 1:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Clay and Hodges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alphonso Tanner v. French, et al
as 24-11098
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO TARODD TANNER
Defendant:
FRENCH, CURRY, SKKRUBS and others
VILCHUCK et al v. HARMON et al
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
SETH A. VILCHUCK
Defendant:
AUSTIN HARMON, TRENT ALLEN, QUENTIN RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodge v. State of North Carolina
as 5:2024hc02075
Petitioner:
Robert L. Hodge
Respondent:
State of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rose v. Darden et al
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Derek Kent Rose
Defendant:
Tony Darden, Cris Desmond, Angela Hodges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woullard v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Randy L. Woullard
Defendant:
M. Mason, Donald Davis, A. Gwara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hodges v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00132
Petitioner:
Gary Lee Hodges
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
John Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
WOODBERRY v. MICHAEL et al
as 1:2024cv00231
Plaintiff:
MANDRAIL JAMAR WOODBERRY
Defendant:
JUDGE MICHAEL, JOHN BANDLE, M. ODOM and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hawkins v. Davis et al
as 3:2024cv00373
Plaintiff:
En'Derrell Hawkins
Defendant:
Det Davis, Det Doyle, Det Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
