Cases 11 - 20 of 195
HERNANDEZ v. REYNOLDS et al
as 1:2023cv00755
Plaintiff:
JOSE REYES HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
REYNOLDS, SGT. J. RUSSELL and LT. B. RICHARDSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HERNANDEZ v. UNKNOWN OFFICER AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
JOSE REYES HERNANDEZ
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICER AT FORSYTH COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023hc02174
Petitioner:
Jose Gregorio Hernandez
Respondent:
Warden William Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hernandez v. USA
as 3:2023cv01319
Petitioner:
Jose Jesus Hernandez, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hernandez-Hernandez v. US
as 23-1153
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOSE ANTONIO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Barraza v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00149
Petitioner:
Jose Israel Hernandez Barraza
Respondent:
David Shinn and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Lumpkin
as 5:2022cv01244
Petitioner:
Jose Flores Hernandez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04095
Plaintiff:
Jose A. Hernandez
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00108
Petitioner:
Jose Gregorio Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hernandez v. United States of America
as 8:2022cv01195
Petitioner:
Jose Gregorio Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
