Cases 11 - 20 of 1,271
Crook v. Salisbury et al
as 1:2024cv00057
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Crook
Defendant:
Wayne T. Salisbury, Jr., Dr. Kimberly Kane, MD, Lynda Aul and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Coit v. B. Salamon, et al
as 24-1207
Plaintiff:
KEVIN COIT
Defendant:
C/O ABDUL-QUDDUS, CAPTAIN ANDREWS, C/O BARNER and others
Kane v. Haynes et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, William Stockwell and Chlarson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1006
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individial capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individial capacity and others
Kane v. Waldo
as 2:2023cv00368
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Waldo and Troy Stull
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coit v. Salamon et al
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
Kevin Coit
Defendant:
B. Salamon, M. Rowe, Woodring and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dorlette v. City of Stamford et al
as 3:2023cv01589
Plaintiff:
Faroulh Dorlette
Defendant:
City of Stamford, Christopher Baker, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
