Cases 11 - 20 of 50
Michael James v. Warden Dallas SCI, et al
as 22-2145
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY JAMES
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN DALLAS SCI, ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY ERIE COUNTY
JAMES v. SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 4:2022cv00077
Petitioner:
MICHAEL JASON JAMES
Respondent:
SECRETARY FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES v. LANDRY et al
as 2:2021cv00371
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN JAMES and MICHEAL JOHN JAMES
Defendant:
SCOTT LANDRY, GLEN BROWN, SUE CARR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. DAME et al
as 2:2021cv00372
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J JAMES and MICHEAL J JAMES
Defendant:
CHARLES DAME, ANTHONY CANTILLO, RANDALL LIBERTY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JAMES v. MORIN et al
as 1:2021cv00076
Defendant:
CAPT PATRICK COCKTEN, CAPT BRUCE DOMENICH, CHAD COOPER and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL JOHN JAMES
Not Classified By Court:
MAINE ATTORNEY GENERAL - PRISONER CASES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Calloway et al (INMATE 3)
as 1:2020cv01046
Plaintiff:
Michael Christopher James
Defendant:
Steven T. Marshall and Rolonda Calloway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bergen v. State of Wisconsin et al
as 2:2020cv00813
Defendant:
Wisconsin Department of Corrections, Unit Supervisor Schroeder, Unit Supervisor Jaeger and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Erwin James Bergen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. USA
as 1:2018cv00091
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Michael S. James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JAMES v. MAHALLY et al
as 1:2016cv00272
Petitioner:
MICHAEL RAY JAMES
Respondent:
LAWRENCE MAHALLY, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ERIE COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James v. State of Alaska
as 4:2016cv00036
Plaintiff:
Michael W. James
Defendant:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
