Cases 11 - 20 of 311
Hillyer v. State of South Dakota et al
as 5:2023cv05031
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Hillyer
Respondent:
State of South Dakota, R.C.P.D. and Grant Scane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Hefner v. State of North Carolina
as 23-6276
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICKY L. HEFNER, a/k/a Richard Lee Hefner
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
Goetsch v. DOC
as 2:2023cv00252
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Goetsch
Defendant:
DOC, Jodi Fields and John or Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christy v. Philips et al
as 4:2023cv00030
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Christy
Defendant:
Don Philips, Wapello County Sheriff's Department, Ottumwa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFITH v. BOP
as 1:2023cv00062
Petitioner:
RICHARD LEE GRIFFITH
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Martinez v. Lengerich
as 1:2022cv03356
Petitioner:
Richard Lee Martinez
Defendant:
Lengerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richard Devito v. USA
as 22-4042
Petitioner / Appellant:
RICHARD LEE DEVITO
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christy v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2022cv00391
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Christy
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Wapello County Sheriff's Department, Ottumwa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARY v. BEASLEY et al
as 7:2022cv00120
Plaintiff:
RICHARD LEE GARY
Defendant:
WARDEN JACOB BEASLEY, OFFICER WILLIAMS, LT EVANS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cox v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Don Michael Cox
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
