Cases 11 - 20 of 8,426
Denning v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv00256
Plaintiff:
Joshua Denning
Defendant:
Robert Powell, Matt Anderson, Wesley Shuman and others
Interested Party:
Correction Section (FYI) and Prisoner Litigation Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sedlak v. USA
as 1:2024cv00913
Petitioner:
Roger Sedlak
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Waldrep #309512 v. Arizona Supreme Court et al
as 2:2024cv01334
Plaintiff:
Roger Darryl Waldrep
Defendant:
Arizona Supreme Court and Arizona, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Cox et al
as 4:2024cv04060
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Harris, Jr
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Rami Cox, Sheriff Jeff Black, Jailer Tristen Burns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegel v. TDOC et al
as 1:2024cv01088
Plaintiff:
James Frederick Hegel
Defendant:
TDOC, Jerrie Avery, Anna Parson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ewing et al v. Byrd et al
as 3:2024cv50213
Plaintiff:
Javion Ewing and Jazariah Lyles
Defendant:
David Byrd, City of DeKalb, DeKalb County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rogers v. Bullard
as 5:2024hc02106
Petitioner:
Antwarn Lee Rogers
Respondent:
Jamie Bullard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gines v. State of Iowa
as 4:2024cv00118
Petitioner:
Tommy Gines, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shawn Canada v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-2091
Plaintiff:
Shawn Canada
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Paul Schnell, In his official capacity as the Commissioner of the Minnesota Dept. of Corrections, et al., Andrew Karlsen, In their official capacity as the staff of Hearing & Release unit of Minnesota Dept. of Corrections Officers and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
