Cases 11 - 20 of 40,154
Goodson v. Bouchard et al
as 4:2024cv11460
Plaintiff:
Jordan Christopher Goodson
Defendant:
Michael J. Bouchard, Oakland, County of, Wellpath and others
Newton v. G.E.O Group, Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Earl Nicholas Newton
Defendant:
G.E.O Group, Inc, C. O. Fields, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Targonsk et al
as 2:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Smith
Defendant:
Targonsk, S. Herrick, G. Swartz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mueller v. Ybarra et al
as 3:2024cv00897
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mueller
Defendant:
J. Ybarra, C.O. Lay, K. Hofman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davon Tate v. Christopher Smith
as 24-6535
Petitioner:
DAVON TATE
Respondent:
WARDEN CHRISTOPHER S. SMITH and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Corrales v. Robinson
as 24-40398
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Corrales
Respondent:
S. Robinson, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute Beaumont Low
Gause v. Covington et al
as 5:2024ct03143
Plaintiff:
Walter Timothy Gause
Defendant:
Captain Ronald Covington, Unit Manager Nealey, S Barnes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Gallegos v. CDCR et al
as 2:2024cv01595
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Robert Gallegos
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, J. Leech, S. Boxall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAUR v. MCGINLEY et al
as 2:2024cv02421
Petitioner:
BRIAN D. BAUR
Respondent:
TOM MCGINLEY, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Taylor a/k/a McCartney v. Arnott
as 6:2024cv03168
Petitioner:
Taylor a/k/a Nigel S McCartney
Respondent:
Jim Arnott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
