Cases 11 - 20 of 1,548
Taper v. Tabor et al
as 1:2024cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joshua Taper
Defendant:
Jon Tabor, Tammy Shelton, Amber Stanley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
SHELTON v. PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE et al
as 1:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PA. BOARD OF PROBATION & PAROLE, SUPERINTENDANT MS. THOMSON and TONY SPREARS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelton v. Inmate Trust Fund
as 6:2024cv00084
Plaintiff:
David L. Shelton
Defendant:
Inmate Trust Fund
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURRAY v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
BRUCE MURRAY
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, LEON LUBIEJEWSKI, JAMES MCNESBY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwight Shelton v. Bryan Birkholz
as 2:2024cv01249
Petitioner:
Dwight Shelton
Respondent:
Bryan Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Norman Shelton v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole, et al
as 24-1203
Plaintiff:
NORMAN SHELTON
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE and SUPERINTENDENT ALBION SCI
Bayse v. Ward et al
as 1:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Robbin Amanda Bayse and Robert Bayse
Defendant:
Timothy Ward, Sharon Lewis, Jauel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Price v. MDOC, et al
as 24-1062
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOSEPH-LEWIS PRICE
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ST. LOUIS CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JOHN CHRISTIANSEN, Warden and others
SHELTON v. USA
as 5:2024cv00021
Petitioner:
TYLER WESLEY SHELTON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Shelton v. Hyde County Sheriff's Department
as 5:2024ct03020
Plaintiff:
Andre C. Shelton
Defendant:
Hyde County Sheriff's Department, Carl M. Cahoon, Stacey Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
