Cases 11 - 20 of 120
Lackey v. USA
as 1:2023cv00726
Petitioner:
Maurice Lackey
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Walton v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2023cv00984
Plaintiff:
Romaris Walton
Defendant:
Deanna Brookhart, Lorie Cunningham, Luking and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lackey v. Napier et al
as 4:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
John Dale Lackey
Defendant:
Mark Napier, Pima County Adult Detention Center, Shiresh Butani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 4:2023cv05022
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demos v. Pierce et al
as 3:2023cv05070
Plaintiff:
John Robert Demos, Jr
Defendant:
Gary Pierce, Jennifer Adams, B Rohan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howell, Jr. v. Simon et al
as 9:2023cv00007
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Darra Simon, Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAUL v. MARSHAWN et al
as 2:2022cv00564
Plaintiff:
ANGELA PAUL
Defendant:
MARSHAWN, CHARLENE BURKETT, OMBUDSMAN BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Schierbaum v. Tom Canavan, et al
as 22-3485
Plaintiff / Appellant:
William Schierbaum
Defendant / Appellee:
Det. Tom Canavan, et al, Wright City Police Department, Chris Beard, Detective and others
Howell, Jr. v. Bridges et al
as 9:2022cv00161
Plaintiff:
Cecil Howell, Jr.
Defendant:
Sean B. Bridges, Michael A. Byerly, Jr., John D. Lackey II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomason v. Dallison et al
as 3:2022cv00834
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Thomason
Defendant:
Dallison, Sara Stover, Wexford Medical Provider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
