Cases 21 - 30 of 24,958
Preston v. Bonn et al
as 5:2024cv11253
Defendant:
Javal, Herell, John Bonn and others
Plaintiff:
Harvey Lee Preston
Krzywkowski v. Mohr et al
as 3:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
Grady Krzywkowski
Defendant:
Mike Davis, Warden Keith Foley, Dessey Cheers and others
Interested Party:
State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00486
Petitioner:
DeMaurea Davis
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nolan v. Davis et al
as 5:2024cv00487
Plaintiff:
Edford Ray Nolan, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley Davis and Enid Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wayne Davis v. Superintendent Camp Hill SCI, et al
as 24-1858
Plaintiff:
WAYNE A. DAVIS
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT CAMP HILL SCI and DISTRICT ATTORNEY BLAIR COUNTY
Perez-Perez v. Garland et al
as 3:2024cv00839
Petitioner:
Carlos Alberto Perez-Perez
Respondent:
Merrick Garland, Ronald L. Davis, Steven C. Stafford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Davis et al v. Grill et al
as 2:2024cv01075
Plaintiff:
Jacob Stephen Davis and Baylee Samuel Farrell
Defendant:
Steven Grill, Shawn Wead, Jody Bradley, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Huckabee et al
as 4:2024cv00418
Plaintiff:
Terry Lee
Defendant:
Sarah Huckabee, Board of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
INGRAM v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv05993
Petitioner:
DAWAN K. INGRAM
Respondent:
BRUCE DAVIS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
