Cases 21 - 30 of 67
Foster v. Harvanek
as 6:2017cv00051
Petitioner:
Quincy D. Foster
Respondent:
Kameron Harvanek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BOGER v. COUNTY CABARRUS et al
as 1:2016cv01192
Petitioner:
DERRICK D. BOGER
Respondent:
COUNTY CABARRUS, K. R. MYERS, V. W. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
BOGER v. FOSTER et al
as 1:2016cv00770
Plaintiff:
DERRICK D. BOGER
Defendant:
JAMES D. FOSTER, MARK SPEARS and JAMES DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Flores et al
as 1:2018cv00525
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Defendant:
Flores, Secritary of California Department Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Flores et al
as 2:2016cv01130
Plaintiff:
Carl Harrison
Defendant:
Flores, Secritary of California Department Correction and Rehabilitation, R. Tolson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McFadden v. Annucci et al
as 6:2016cv06105
Plaintiff:
Reginald McFadden
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Jr., Maureen Boll, Jeff McKoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. City of Duluth et al
as 1:2015cv03683
Plaintiff:
Pierre C. Scott
Defendant:
Bobby W. Johnson, Jr. and Frances D. Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perkins v. Foster
as 1:2015cv00108
Plaintiff:
Corey Perkins
Defendant:
D Foster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FOSTER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
as 4:2015cv00046
Plaintiff:
RICHARD D. FOSTER
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ronald Martinez v. Kathleen Allison, et al
as 14-16880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD F. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
KATHLEEN ALLISON, Warden, Warden Acting at California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), KENT CLARK, Warden of California Substance Abuse Treatment Facility (CSATF), WILLIAM J. SULLIVAN, Associate Director of General Population (Sacramento) and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
