Cases 21 - 30 of 122
Lenoir v. Guyer et al
as 9:2019cv00191
Respondent:
Lynn Guyer and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Petitioner:
Jason Devon Lenoir
In Re:
NEF-MSP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lenoir (DO NOT FILE) v. State of Mississippi et al
as 1:2019cv00209
Respondent:
State of Mississippi and The Attorney General of the State of Mississippi
Petitioner:
Robert Lenoir (DO NOT FILE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lenoir v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2019cv00445
Defendant:
IHU Staff, NHU Staff, Prea Compliance Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Delshaun Lenoir
Not Yet Classified:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purnell v. Lenoir County Sheriff Department et al
as 5:2019ct03034
Plaintiff:
Toma Mandrill Purnell
Defendant:
Ms. Vick and Lenoir County Sheriff Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koonce v. Lenoir County
as 5:2019hc02020
Petitioner:
Darrell Koonce
Respondent:
Lenoir County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thompson v. Lenoir County Courthouse
as 5:2018hc02317
Petitioner:
Maurice Edward Thompson
Respondent:
Lenoir County Courthouse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wilson v. Lenoir et al
as 1:2018cv07500
Defendant:
Howe, Powel, Finn and others
Plaintiff:
Qawmane Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Smith v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 2:2018cv02942
Defendant:
B. Harrington, E. Rose, C. Fackrell and others
Plaintiff:
Michael LeNoir Smith and Michael Lenior Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Shaw et al
as 1:2018cv06935
Defendant:
Officer McHugh, Officer Shaw, Officer Stoch and others
Plaintiff:
David Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scarberry v. Lenoir et al
as 1:2018cv00199
Defendant:
Frank Landeis, Standin Rock Agency, Justin Lenoir and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob E. Lee Scarberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
