Cases 21 - 30 of 1,307
(PC) Page v. Navarrete
as 5:2024cv01424
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence Page
Defendant:
Jorge E. Navarrete
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kampe v. Page
as 2:2024cv04037
Petitioner:
Jamie Ray Kampe
Respondent:
Justine Page
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cain v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Anthony Cain
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Ofc Luke Jornstead, Ofc Tayor Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith #340475 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Paris J. Smith #340475
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Jeff
as 24-40085
Plaintiff:
Secial Heath
Defendant:
Lee Jeff, Ronald Page and David Davidison
Sivak v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Lacey Sivak
Defendant:
SGT. Ramirez, Aaron Fodge, R. Findeisen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. McCormack et al
as 2:2024cv04022
Plaintiff:
Prentice Wilson
Defendant:
Tristan McCormack, Justin Page and Spencer Colliatie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Singletary v. Aiken County Code Enforcement Division et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff:
John G Singletary
Defendant:
Aiken County Code Enforcement Division, Rodney Cooper, Page Bayne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson et al v. Page et al
as 5:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
Paul Jackson and Jessica Jackson
Defendant:
Sgt Noah Page, Destin Owens, Calloway County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
