Cases 21 - 30 of 2,533
Peterson v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Gary Glenn Peterson
Respondent:
FCI Texarkana Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
PETERSON v. ACCHIONE et al
as 2:2024cv04347
Plaintiff:
LEVAUNT PETERSON
Defendant:
K. ACCHIONE and S.C.O. M. MCDONALD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Seibold et al
as 7:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
John Peterson, III
Defendant:
LT. S. Seibold, Msgt. T. Warner and Sgt. A. Ligon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Peterson v. Wright et al
as 3:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
DeAndrey Peterson
Defendant:
Steven Wright, Hannah Evans, J Pugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patton v. Ealey et al
as 5:2024cv10771
Plaintiff:
Steven Patton
Defendant:
Tina Ealey, R. Green, Peterson and others
(PC) Rodriguez-Mendez v. Ellred,et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Rodriguez-Mendez
Defendant:
Dr. Ellred, Kerney, Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Peterson v. Landhandle
as 1:2024cv00542
Plaintiff:
Isaac Peterson
Defendant:
Sheriff Kasey Landhandle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Ward
as 3:2024cv00116
Petitioner:
Quinton Peterson
Respondent:
Josh Ward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Aaron Clark, IV v. C. Wilson, et al
as 24-1128
Plaintiff:
AARON CLARK, IV
Defendant:
TIMOTHY PERTTU, Resident Unit Manager, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER SKYTTA, in personal capacity, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MICHAELSON, in personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
