Cases 21 - 30 of 199
Robinson v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Antonio C Robinson
Defendant:
Lay, D W Johnson and Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2022cv00910
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Oscar v. FCC Coleman II USP et al
as 5:2022cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jean Erole Oscar and ZB
Defendant:
FCC Coleman II USP, FNU Kasmuke, United States of America and others
Respondent:
FNU Wegner and FNU Clemens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Johnson v. Richland County Jail et al
as 9:2022cv00475
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Richland County Jail, Christopher Blunk, James Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Johnson v. Joe Lizarraga, et al
as 22-15604
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL W. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, The Warden, CHARLOTTE REYNOLS, The SuperintendentII Cal PIA, C. SMITH, MD FACP Chief Physician/Surgeon and others
JOHNSON v. LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
as 5:2022cv01279
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
LEHIGH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cuomo et al
as 1:2022cv00217
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Andrew M. Cuomo, New York State, Prisoner Legal Services of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Schnurr
as 22-3004
Petitioner / Appellant:
LUTHER W. JOHNSON, III
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN SCHNURR
Johnson v. Brown et al
as 3:2021cv00680
Plaintiff:
Clifton W. Johnson
Defendant:
D. Brown, Hicks and Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Broomfield
as 5:2021cv07158
Plaintiff:
LaCedric W. Johnson
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Kathleen Allison, Clarence Cryer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
