Cases 31 - 40 of 685
Stafford v. Hamilton County et al
as 1:2023cv00113
Plaintiff:
Tyler Lee Stafford
Defendant:
Hamilton County, Jim Hammond, QCHC of Tennessee, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reco Manning v. United States, et al
as 23-1799
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reco D. Manning
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America, Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Armajo v. Wyoming Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2023cv00065
Defendant:
Corthell and King PC, Wyoming Public Defender, Wyoming Public Defender Trial Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Alfred Armajo, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Browne v. Booth
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Edgar Bachman Browne
Defendant:
Cpl Edward Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. United States of America, Department of Justice et al
as 6:2023cv03098
Petitioner:
Jeremy Orr
Defendant:
United States of America, Department of Justice
Respondent:
David Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ingram v. Booth
as 0:2023cv00699
Plaintiff:
Clifton Ingram
Defendant:
Sgt. Booth
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Booth v. Santos
as 2:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Patrick J. Booth
Defendant:
Dawn Santos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2023cv05677
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN BURKE BERRY
Defendant:
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RICKY DIXON, Z CULPEPPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
