Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Sexton #261888 v. Ryan et al
as 4:2014cv01984
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Sexton
Respondent:
Charles Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hughes v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00709
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Hughes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail, Dewitt County Jail and Kankakee County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Cook County Jail et al
as 1:2014cv00710
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Hughes
Defendant:
Cook County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nielsen v. Grant, City of et al
as 0:2013cv03543
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Nielsen
Respondent:
Grant, City of , William M. Hutton , Washington County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jeffrey Denny, Sr. v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 12-4504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY LYNN DENNY, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
DENNY v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Petitioner:
JEFFREY LYNN DENNY, SR.
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PA and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Wilson, et al
as 11-8040
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY LYNN SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
EDDIE WILSON, Warden, Wyoming State Penitentiary, ROBERT O. LAMPERT, Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections and BRUCE SALZBURG, Attorney General, State of Wyoming
Myers v. USA
as 5:2011cv00065
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Myers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nelson v. Helton et al
as 1:2011cv00016
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lynn Nelson, Jr.
Defendant:
Kyle Helton, Teresa Maddox, (f/n/u) Knupps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Wilson et al
as 2:2010cv00075
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Lynn Smith
Respondent:
Wyoming State Penitentiary Warden, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director and State of Wyoming Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
