Cases 31 - 40 of 40
Elphic v. Turner et al
as 3:2017cv03016
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Elphic
Defendant:
Tisha Turner, Brent Symens, Peter Newell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2016cv02884
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio, Fulton Brock, Don Stapley and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. USA
as 3:2016cv00338
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Jonathan James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Newell v. White et al
as 1:2014cv00320
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Newell
Defendant:
Susan R. White, Jackie Huggins and Lynn B. Ollis
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
Ashley Adams, et al v. Brad Livingston, et al
as 14-40756
Plaintiff - Appellee:
ASHLEY ADAMS, Individually and as the representative of the Estate of Rodney Gerald Adams, WANDA ADAMS, Individually, MARY LOU JAMES, Individually and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BRAD LIVINGSTON, Individually and in his official capacity, WARDEN RICK THALER and WILLIAM STEPHENS
Adams et al v. Livingston et al
as 6:2013cv00712
Plaintiff:
Ashley Adams , Wanda Adams , Mary Lou James and others
Respondent:
Brad Livingston , Rick Thaler , Robert Eason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Newell v. Daniels
as 5:2013hc02057
Petitioner:
Jonathan James Newell
Respondent:
Dennis Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perez v. Ripps, Jr. et al
as 5:2010cv00847
Defendant:
Pablo H. Cruz and Alvin J. Ripps, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jonathan James v. George Hagan
as 09-6712
Petitioner - Appellant:
JONATHAN JAMES
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE T. HAGAN, Warden, Allendale Correctional Institution
James v. Hagan
as 0:2008cv01106
Petitioner:
Jonathan James
Respondent:
George T Hagan
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
