Cases 31 - 40 of 589
Jones v. Peterson et al
as 4:2023cv01069
Plaintiff:
Brandon M Jones
Defendant:
Rebekah Peterson, Benjamin Martin, Jason Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Watson v. B. Kanode
as 23-7098
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN A. WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
B. L. KANODE, H. SHARPE, T. DOWELL and others
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 1:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Tennessee
as 2:2023cv01231
Petitioner:
Chris M. Jones
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Hughes et al
as 3:2023cv50371
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Robinson
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Deputy Chief, District One Parole Re-Entry Group Supervisor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. Jones et al
as 3:2023cv05926
Plaintiff:
Anthony Shrone Person and Anthony Shane Person
Defendant:
Ramona M Jones, Romona M Person, Alannah M Athens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jason Jones v. William Stange
as 23-3239
Petitioner / Appellant:
Jason M. Jones
Respondent / Appellee:
William Stange
JONES v. DILLS
as 5:2023cv00373
Petitioner:
TRACY M JONES
Respondent:
ALLEN DILLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Missouri Dept. of Probation and Parole et al
as 1:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Jason M. Jones
Defendant:
Missouri Dept. of Probation and Parole, Anne Precythe and Libby Banks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Person v. Jones, et al
as 23-6135
Petitioner / Appellant:
ANTHONY SHRONE PERSON
Respondent / Appellee:
RAMMA M. JONES, ALANNAH M. ATKINS, DANIEL PATTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
