Cases 31 - 40 of 1,203
Norwood v. Smith et al
as 3:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Timothy Norwood
Defendant:
Susan Smith and Judge Mahan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steven Norwood v. USA 2255
as 1:2023cv01117
Petitioner:
Steven Norwood
Respondent:
USA 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Norwood v. United States Parole Commission
as 3:2023cv00411
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ray v. Norwood
as 6:2023cv00067
Petitioner:
Eric S. Ray
Respondent:
Joseph Norwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Norwood v. Kane County Jail et al
as 1:2023cv00744
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Kane County Jail, Kane County, Illinois, Ron Hain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Lauderdale County Jail et al
as 3:2023cv00093
Plaintiff:
Shamekia Latsha Norwood
Defendant:
Lauderdale County Jail, Meridian Police Department Jail, Unknown Bennett and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McBroom v. Boyd et al
as 3:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Sahelian Deondrae McBroom
Defendant:
Marty Boyd, Calderone, Stanfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hooks v. Blocker et al
as 6:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dewayne Hooks
Defendant:
Blocker, Joe Norwood, Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. Carter et al
as 3:2022cv02862
Plaintiff:
Ricky Norwood, Jr.
Defendant:
Clay Carter, Brian Carter, Troy Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norwood v. USA
as 3:2022cv01492
Petitioner:
Michael Norwood
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
