Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 6,525
Woods v. Wiza
as 1:2024cv01884
Petitioner: Fabian Woods, Jr.
Respondent: Scott Wiza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mahmoud v. Holz et al
as 2:2024cv00806
Plaintiff: Mohamed Abdalla Mahmoud
Defendant: Holz, Bartlette, Brendal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mannie v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv50160
Plaintiff: Markus Mannie
Defendant: Latoya Hughes, Andrea Tack, Jacob J. Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kepler et al v. NaphCare Incorporated et al
as 4:2024cv00220
Plaintiff: Karina Kepler, Carlin Casey and Mary Hutchinson
Defendant: NaphCare Incorporated, Pima, County of, Chris Nanos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Herrick, MD, MSHA, et al
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff: James R Wood
Defendant: Steve Herrick, MD, Alvin Harris, MD, Clarence Friend, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wood v. Gibson
as 4:2024cv00361
Plaintiff: Steven Ray Wood
Defendant: James Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOOD v. USA
as 2:2024cv00606
Petitioner: CLIFFORD WOOD
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Palmer v. Patrick County Sheriffs Office et al
as 7:2024cv00272
Plaintiff: Seth D. Palmer
Defendant: Patrick County Sheriffs Office, Deputy Kenny, Deputy Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv01827
Plaintiff: MARK WOODS
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WOODS v. WARDEN USP CANAAN
as 2:2024cv01833
Petitioner: MARK WOODS
Respondent: WARDEN USP CANAAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?