Cases 41 - 50 of 1,635
Fernando Alvarez-Carvajal v. USA
as 23-2647
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO ALVAREZ-CARVAJAL
Respondent / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-6809
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CHERE v. CRUZ
as 1:2023cv04723
Petitioner:
JAIME FERNANDO GRACIA CHERE
Respondent:
WARDEN CRUZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vallecilla v. Harrison
as 3:2023cv00519
Plaintiff:
Luis Fernando Castro Vallecilla
Defendant:
Warden C. Harrison
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fernando Carlos Lopez v. E. Guzman et al
as 5:2023cv01456
Petitioner:
Fernando Carlos Lopez
Respondent:
E. Guzman and The People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martinez v. Marschke et al
as 3:2023cv08337
Plaintiff:
Fernando Martinez
Defendant:
R Marschke, Diane Miller and GEO Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez, Jr. v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel R. Harry, Michael Wenerowicz, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lopez v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico, et al
as 23-2108
Petitioner / Appellant:
FERNANDO LOPEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO and JULIAN MARQUEZ, Warden
(PC) deOliveira v. Macomber et al
as 1:2023cv01022
Plaintiff:
Fernando Miguel deOliveira
Defendant:
Jeff Macomber, Scott Wiener, Dr. A. Ola and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tartt v. Whynott et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00410
Plaintiff:
Fernando Tartt
Defendant:
Christine Whynott and Ionathor Hamilton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
