Cases 41 - 50 of 68
Groce v. Warden, Qualls, et al
as 1:2014cv00127
Plaintiff:
Timothy Groce
Defendant:
Eric Qualls, Darren Settles and Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MILLER v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2014cv01590
Plaintiff:
GREGORY WILLIAM MILLER
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA and HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheves v. USA
as 4:2014cv00019
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gregory William Cheves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Williams v. Kohler et al
as 5:2013cv05213
Plaintiff:
Steven Gregory Williams
Defendant:
Lori Kohler and Juan Calzetta
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Williams v. Aaron Sprague, et al
as 13-36000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
AARON SPRAGUE, Attorney, JUDY DOE, Oregon Dept of Corr Correctional Ombudsman, LEONARD WILLIAMSON, Inspector General and others
Steven Barnes v. Attorney Gregory Seigler
as 13-7053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEVEN LOUIS BARNES
Defendant - Appellee:
GREGORY WILLIAM SEIGLER
Defendant:
LT. MARK HOWARD
Williams v. Hallman et al
as 2:2013cv00950
Defendant:
Prisoner Mohamed Ahmed, (EOCI) Asst. Supt. Bridgette Amsberry, BHS Counselor Anderson and others
OSP:
ODOC Health Serv. Mgr. Steve Shelton and Dr. John Vargo
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kenneth Williams v. Steve Shelton, et al
as 13-35232
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KENNETH GREGORY WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVE SHELTON, M.D., OLE HANSAN, Doctor, Oregon State Penitentiay, GREG ABBE, Intake Center Practitioner and others
Norman #245031 v. Williams
as 1:2012cv01245
Plaintiff:
Dominic Omari Norman #245031
Defendant:
Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Reed et al
as 5:2012cv00882
Defendant:
Sheriff Amadeo Ortiz and District Attorney Susan Reed
Plaintiff:
Gregory Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
