Cases 41 - 50 of 416
Jarpa v. King et al
as 2:2022cv00373
Plaintiff:
Ralph C. Jarpa
Defendant:
J. King, Ted Hull and Ms. M. Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ricky Butler v. Edward Hull
as 22-6903
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICKY BUTLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SUPERINTENDENT EDWARD HULL, a/k/a Ted Hull, NURSE HRYN, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT PHYLLIS BACK, a/k/a Back and others
Defendant:
NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL and NORTHERN NECK REGIONAL JAIL BOARD
Rivera Alvarez v. MCI-H
as 1:2022cv01861
Plaintiff:
Miguel A. Rivera Alvarez
Defendant:
MCI-H, Warden Gregory A. Werner, Asst. Warden Todd A. Hull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Williams
as 3:2022cv01559
Petitioner:
Aaron Hull
Respondent:
Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Haynes et al
as 3:2022cv05492
Plaintiff:
James L Johnson, III
Defendant:
Ron Haynes, Rob Schreiber, Gina Penrose and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. MaCauley
as 2:2022cv11318
Petitioner:
Omar S. Hull Jr.
Respondent:
G. David Guinn, F. Kay Bhem and Matt MaCauley
SIMERSON v. BELGER et al
as 1:2022cv00420
Plaintiff:
TERRY KEITH SIMERSON
Defendant:
BELGER, JAIL FINANCE, MARY CINDY JOEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hull v. Warden FCI Pekin
as 1:2022cv01173
Petitioner:
Daniel R Hull
Respondent:
Warden FCI Pekin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hull v. Bhem et al
as 2:2022cv11051
Plaintiff:
Omar S. Hull
Defendant:
F. Kay Bhem, Lawyers, Detectives and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.