Cases 41 - 50 of 313
Edwards v. United States of America
as 6:2022cv00350
Petitioner:
James John Edwards
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Adams v. Cumberland County Detention Center
as 5:2022ct03027
Plaintiff:
John Edward Adams
Defendant:
Cumberland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. Edwards et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Marvin Glenn Deal
Defendant:
John Edwards, James M. LeBlanc, Division of Probation, Parole an Boards of Pardons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. United States of America
as 7:2021cv00620
Plaintiff:
John Edward White
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2021cv01335
Plaintiff:
John Edward White
Defendant:
of America United States
Interested Party:
Staff Attorneys
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Clark County et al
as 2:2021cv02023
Plaintiff:
John Edward Jackson
Defendant:
Clark County, Clark Detention Center, Clark County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00702
Plaintiff:
John Edward White
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SWIFT v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2021cv00243
Petitioner:
DONNIE JAVON SWIFT
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, JOHN EDWARD WETZEL, SUPERINTENDENT DEREK OBERLANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James III v. Nanos et al
as 4:2021cv00341
Petitioner:
John Edwards James and John Edwards James, III
Respondent:
Christopher Nanos and Tucson Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Nails v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv00434
Petitioner:
John Edward Nails
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
