Cases 41 - 50 of 522
Simms v. Lilley
as 22-2995
Petitioner / Appellant:
Keith Simms
Respondent / Appellee:
Superintendent Lynn Lilley
BRADLEY v. BYRD et al
as 2:2022cv00522
Plaintiff:
JERMAINE C. BRADLEY
Defendant:
BYRD, CLARKE, K. HOBSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Simms v. Lynch
as 2:2022cv01793
Plaintiff:
Robert Lee Simms
Defendant:
Jeff Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hiatt v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01697
Petitioner:
Simon Calvin Simms Hiatt
Respondent:
United States of America and J Engleman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Allen v. Bond et al
as 5:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
Monica Bond, Jerry Laws, FNU Harrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MEYERS v. HAFEEZ et al
as 1:2022cv00829
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
SGT. MR. HAFEEZ, SGT. MR. HUNT, OFFICER MR. BARNES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Allen v. Bond et al
as 5:2022ct03356
Plaintiff:
Johnnie D. Allen
Defendant:
Monica Bond, Jerry Laws, Sgt. Harrold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simms v. Barker et al
as 2:2022cv01536
Plaintiff:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
Daniel Barker, Central Intelligence Agency, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Simms v. US Customs & Border Protection et al
as 5:2022cv00085
Petitioner:
Franklin Shane Simms
Defendant:
US Customs & Border Protection and CIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hiatt v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv01380
Petitioner:
Simon Calvin Simms Hiatt
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
