Cases 41 - 50 of 1,233
Muhammad v. Wiles
as 23-50786
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bilal Muhammad
Defendant / Appellee:
Richard Wiles, El Paso County Sheriff, Marco Vargas, Kevin Lanahan and others
Gibson v. Doe et al
as 1:2023cv09474
Plaintiff:
David Gibson
Defendant:
Warden Jane Doe, Warden Harvey, Nurse Medical Director Assistant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Vargas v. Warden
as 1:2023cv09348
Petitioner:
Jesus Vargas
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00318
Petitioner:
Efrain Ortiz-Vargas
Respondent:
Warden R. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cipriano Vargas v. FCC-Lompoc Low II, Warden
as 2:2023cv08692
Petitioner:
Cipriano Vargas
Respondent:
FCC-Lompoc Low II, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Sepulveda-Castro v. Administracion de Correccion
as 3:2023cv01499
Plaintiff:
Miguel Sepulveda-Castro
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion and Miguel Sepulveda-Vargas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rollerson v. FMC Fort Worth
as 4:2023cv01014
Plaintiff:
Braddic Deshaun Rollerson
Defendant:
FMC Fort Worth, Phil Sorrells, Counselor Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vargas v. Brown
as 5:2023cv00307
Petitioner:
Gorge Vargas
Respondent:
Warden Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Cunningham #360525 v. NaphCare et al
as 2:2023cv02039
Plaintiff:
Carnell Antoin Cunningham
Defendant:
NaphCare, Unknown Vargas and Unknown Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz-Vargas v. Brown et al
as 5:2023cv00306
Petitioner:
Efrain Ortiz-Vargas
Respondent:
Warden Brown and Director of BOP C. Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
